Compare and Contrast “Disabled” by Wilfred Owen and...

COMPARE AND CONTRAST â€Å"DISABLED† BY WILFRED OWEN AND â€Å"OUT, OUT-†BY ROBERT FROST. IN WHAT WAYS DO THEY EXPLORE THE THEME OF PAIN AND SUFFERING? These two poems are very different in terms of syntax, structure and actions, but the tone is the same in each. Both poems make us pity the young boys who were forced to grow up before their time, not understanding the possible consequences of their actions. They are connected in this way despite being thrown out of life differently (and because of different reasons) but because both were moved by the desire to be seen as better or older in the eyes of others. This is ironic as they are simply forgotten by the people they wanted to impress, be they the girls with the â€Å"slim waists† or the anonymous†¦show more content†¦Furthermore this continuity highlights the actual point of they boy’s accident, together with his death, as caesuras and harsher sounds are being used in the words to make it all more dramatic. â€Å"Disabled† also uses language to make the poem more moving or to get a point across, such as how neither the soldier’s nor the boyà ¢â‚¬â„¢s names or details are given so that we understand that these kinds of disasters can happen to anyone (that they are not the exceptions). These uses of diction let us understand the tragedies of both poems’ characters better. The structure helps show us how â€Å"Disabled† is allowing the soldier to dwell on the problems and feel regret, while the boy never has the chance. This is what I meant when I mentioned the different kinds of pain present in the poems - the soldier actually feels the world’s indifference that makes everything so much worse to him, while the same is happening to the boy but he never actually has to feel the dispassion and disinterest towards his death. That is what makes the poems so cruel, not the physical injuries themselves and Owen uses that by avoiding any graphic description of the wound, but focusing on everything he has lost in terms of human contact. He never mentions regretting the power to walk, but he sees how â€Å"the women’s eyes passed from him to the strong men that were whole† - he has had the time to notice that he is incomplete. The realization that it is his fault that

The Epic Of Gilgamesh And The Code Of Hammurabi - 983 Words

World Civilizations Essay The Mesopotamian society lived a long life which included the writings, â€Å"Epic of Gilgamesh† in the beginning and led to the â€Å"Code of Hammurabi†. Although these significant texts have been written centuries apart, they have quite a few similarities and differences. I am going to discuss them each separately, explain how their leaderships compare and contrast, and how change came over time. These texts are basically led by the rulers of that time. In Uruk it is King Gilgamesh who rules, while in Babylon it is King Hammurabi; they are the ones who govern the laws that are included in each text. So the Epic of Gilgamesh comes from the first state which is Uruk and so happens to be the first piece of literature around 2800 BCE. It is an extended version of literature, meaning it is a set of stories, not a poem or anything like that. It was the birth of a hero named Gilgamesh in Uruk and had many points to it like friendship, civilizations, and life or death situations between certain people. The story gave meaning to the people of Mesopotamia of how their indication of life may be relating to the morals and values of the people. Gilgamesh did not just rule the city; he was as well an amazing warrior. He was really brave and demonstrated trust between his companions. Another character that comes from the reading is Enkidu whom is a wild man who comes from the gods and has an unusual interaction with Gilgamesh. On the other hand, the Code of HammurabiShow MoreRelatedSimilarities Between Mesopotamian And Ancient Mesopotamia1628 Words   |  7 Pagesdrastically. This can be shown in the Great Lyre, from the Royal Tomb of Ur, Stele of Naram-sin, from Sipper, Babylon, and Law Code of Hammurabi, which was also caved in Babylon as well. All three pieces of art are very different and are from different parts of Mesopotamia. However, they all have one main thing in common; the Great Lyre, the Stele of Naram-sin, and the Law C ode of Hammurabi show the hierarchical shift and rise of the sun god, Utu. History The Mesopotamians had many gods and goddess. SometimesRead MoreWorld History Chapter 1 Essays624 Words   |  3 Pagesobserved death and afterlife from a distance and some made them into a series of myths. For instance, â€Å"The Epic of Gilgamesh† expresses its idea on eventual death. No matter how hard Gilgamesh tries to lengthen his life, his death is predestined. The Mesopotamians viewed afterlife as an inevitable end. 2. What is the message of Siduri’s advice to Gilgamesh? The message from Siduri to Gilgamesh is that one cannot hurry to the meaning of life. As God assigned us all to our eventually endings, weRead MoreAncient Mesopotamia Essay1004 Words   |  5 Pagesdemonstrate that many prominent sources in ancient literature, law codes, and archaic Sumerian religion reflect the rigorous geographic and natural conditions which caused this deterministic mindset. The Epic of Gilgamesh, perhaps the most important literary piece of Mesopotamia, displays a world in which even the mightiest of human beings possessed little freedom to control their own fate due to an insurmountable environment. The Epic of Gilgamesh’s plot centers on Gilgamesh’s unavailing struggleRead MoreLiterature, Law Codes, And Archaic Sumerian Religion1003 Words   |  5 Pagesdemonstrate that many prominent sources in ancient literature, law codes, and archaic Sumerian religion reflect the rigorous geographic and natural conditions which caused this deterministic mindset. The Epic of Gilgamesh, perhaps the most important literary piece of Mesopotamia, displays a world in which even the mightiest of human beings possessed little freedom to control their own fate due to an insurmountable environment. The Epic of Gilgamesh’s plot centers on Gilgamesh’s unavailing struggle toRead MoreThe Civilizations Of Ancient Civilization1178 Words   |  5 Pagestime, The Epic of Gilgamesh, is also useful in determining the values of the Sumerians. The poem begins by talking about how bad of a king Gilgamesh was, showing that the Sumerians valued good, kind kings. The people prayed to their gods asking for them to punish Gilgamesh for being a bad king, so the gods sent Enkidu, a human who acts like a beast. When Enkidu is â€Å"tamed† and becomes more â€Å"human† Gilgamesh says that Enkidu â€Å"gained [reason] and expanded his understanding† (The Epic of Gilgamesh). ThisRead MoreEpic of Gilgamesh Essay1021 Words   |  5 PagesEp ic of Gilgamesh . Mesopotamia, current day Iraq, derived its name from words meaning, the land between the rivers, which refers to the Tigris and Euphrates. This land was inhabited during the fourth millennium B.C.E. and throughout time transcended into political and military organizations. The significance of these cultures revolved around important warrior figures and their impact on society. The most important figure that will be discussed is the protagonist from The Epic of GilgameshRead MoreHow Writing Is Important For The Creation Of Organized Societies1564 Words   |  7 Pagesof tax was the Code of Ur - Nammu. It was written in Sumerian on clay tablets and governed the regions of Mespotamia. At the time laws were viewed on a universal standpoint. In other words, it was perceived that the law came from the gods and the rulers of the society just implemented them. This view further enhanced the way people acted accordingly. An even more widely recognized law in ancient history that ca me 300 years after the Code of Ur - Nammu was the Code of Hammurabi. Originated inRead MoreAncient Concepts Of Law, Government, And Social Structure1408 Words   |  6 PagesIn the readings, there are many trends regarding ancient concepts of law, government, and social structure. The code of Hammurabi played a significant role in Mesopotamian law, while the Nile River had a large part in the development of Egyptian civilization. In addition, the Hebrews moved toward pure monotheism and the Persians enhanced the Near Eastern model of monarchical government. â€Å"The evidence reveals that on the one hand, peoples then living in the Near East, Africa, and the MediterraneanRead More The History of Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt Essay1323 Words   |  6 Pageshistorians found a long narrative known as the Epic of Gilgamesh. Gilgamesh is a great hero and ruler who sets out to recover cedar from northern lands. He travels with his companion Enkidu, who is killed by the storm god, Enli l. Mourning the loss of his companion and confronted by death himself, Gilgamesh travels the world in search of eternal life. He ends up finding the plant of eternal youth, but a serpent swallows it while he is bathing. The epic ends with his death and funeral. The SumeriansRead MoreThe Greatest Hero Figure Of Ancient Mesopotamia Essay977 Words   |  4 Pagesabout how people in the past had believed in and how it is thought of compared to today s society and culture. The best-known individual of Mesopotamia was Gilgamesh. He was in a cycle of stories called Epic of Gilgamesh. Gilgamesh was the greatest hero figure of ancient Mesopotamia. Though the stories focus on the adventures of both Gilgamesh and his friend Enkidu, the stories explored themes like ambition and the longing for immortality. These themes reflected the interests of the urban-based society

Upper Tier Rights Free Essays

There are many cases in the history of constitutional law that involve the wording of the United States Constitution. One case that deals with many parts of the constitution is Miranda v Arizona. This was a case that the Supreme Court voted on in 1966. We will write a custom essay sample on Upper Tier Rights or any similar topic only for you Order Now This is a case of upper tier rights, because it deals with the constitutional rights. It mostly deals with the fourteenth amendment which is a right to due process and the sixth amendment which is a right to counsel.A suspect, Ernesto Miranda, was arrested on mostly circumstantial evidence for the kidnapping and rape of an 18 year old female. During the interrogation by the police Miranda confessed to the kidnapping and rape of the female. He also signed a paper that said he was giving a voluntary statement to the police and that the police were not forcing him to confess to the crimes which he may or may not have committed. To most this sounds like the police did an alright job they got a confession out of him and there was no signs of abuse by the police.So many would say what is the problem? Why is this even considered a constitutional law case? How did Miranda v. Arizona turn into a landmark United States Supreme Court case? When this case went to trial Miranda’s court appointed attorney found out that the police never informed Miranda of his Constitutional right to counsel. So in fact by not informing Miranda that he had the right to counsel the police violated his Fourteenth Amendment which is the right to due process and his sixth amendment which is a right to counsel.If he would have had counsel present in the room he may never have signed that form confessing to the kidnapping and rape of that 18 year old woman. Miranda’s court appointed attorney at trial objected to the confession saying that his clients fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendment rights were violated. The trial judge overruled the objection mainly because the defendant never formally asked to have an attorney present or to see or speak with his attorney. So Miranda was convicted of the crime and sent to up to 30 years in prison.Miranda’s attorney the a ppealed the decision all the way up to the Arizona supreme court. The Arizona Supreme Court ruled that they also believed that his rights were not violated because he never asked for an attorney. The Next step Miranda’s Attorney took was that he asked the United States Supreme Court to hear the case and they did. Then on June 13th, 1966 then United States Supreme Court ruled that Ernesto Miranda’s Constitutional rights had been violated by the police. The vote was close it was a 5-4 vote.Chief Justice Earl Warren along with Justices, Black, Douglass, Brennan, and Fortas thought that Miranda’s rights were violated and Justices Clark, Harlan, Stewart, and White thought that the police had acted in the correct manor. This was one of the most historical cases in United States Supreme court history. This basically told police that if you did not inform the individual that he has a right to counsel you can not use any confession or information gathered from that. This is considered an upper tier rights case because it not only deals with one amendment but it actually deals with two others.The fifth, sixth and fourteenth amendments all come into play with this case. Police no Mirandize all suspects before talking to them and almost all law enforcement personal actually do it as they are arresting the suspect just to make sure. A suspect has the right to waive Miranda but then can not use it in the court case later on. In conclusion Miranda v Arizona became a land mark case in United States law history because it one had many constitutional rights broken in it that were corrected by the United States Supreme Court.It also actually helped the law enforcement agencies do their job better. It helped prevent other suspects from having their rights broken like Ernesto Miranda had his. Like stated earlier this is a prime example of upper tier rights because it not only deals with one constitutional right but three and they are three of the most important amendments, the fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendments.Sources Miranda v. Arizona, U. S. Supreme Court Case Summary amp; Oral Argument. (n. d. ). The Oyez Project | U. S. Supreme Court Oral Argument Recordings, Case Abstracts and More. Retrieved December 10, 2010, from http://www. oyez. org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_759 Miranda v. Arizona. (n. d. ). LII | Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School. Retrieved December 10, 2010, from http://www. law. cornell. edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0384_0436_ZS. html The Supreme Court . Expanding Civil Rights . Landmark Cases . Miranda v. Arizona (1966) | PBS. (n. d. ). PBS: Public Broadcasting Service. Retrieved December 10, 2010, from http://www. pbs. org/wnet/supremecourt/rights/landmark_miranda. html How to cite Upper Tier Rights, Papers

Hebrew Greek Japanese And Hindu Creation Stories free essay sample

Hebrew, Greek, Japanese, And Hindu Creation Stories Essay, Research Paper Each of the four creative activity narratives had its ain manner of explicating creative activity. The Gods in the narratives were really alone in their ain manner. They all represented many different things and thoughts. Each narrative had its ain particular thoughts and features. However, all of the narratives were likewise in a manner, because they all told of a particular clip that is held sacred to all worlds. The four creative activity narratives had many similarities, every bit good as, differences. First, the Hebrew creative activity narrative told of one God who created the universe in six yearss. He made everything nowadays on the Earth, every bit good as, adult male and adult female. We will write a custom essay sample on Hebrew Greek Japanese And Hindu Creation Stories or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page He made adult male in his ain image, so he himself looked like a human. God was over everything that was pure and good. However, a snake was present in the topographic point where God had put the adult male and adult female. The snake was evil and it persuaded the adult female and adult male to disobey God # 8217 ; s wants. The human # 8217 ; s function in the Hebrew narrative was to multiply, be fruitful, and govern all things on the Earth. The Hebrew narrative consisted of merely one God, unlike the other narratives in which there were many Gods, who had a distinguishable power. The human # 8217 ; s function in this creative activity narrative is to multiply and govern, whereas, worlds in the other narratives are ruled by the Gods or worlds are non even mentioned at all. This narrative is like the other creative activity narratives because they all mention a Eden and Earth in some manner. Next, the Grecian creative activity narrative contained many Gods. The first God was Chaos. Gaia ( Earth ) was following and was a topographic point for all of the immortals who lived on Olympus. Tartarus lived in a deep hole inside Earth. Eros was the most fine-looking of the immortals. Black Night and Erebus came from Chaos. Night had Aether and Day. Ouranos ( Heaven ) was produced by Gaia to be all around her and the other Gods. She bore Pontus the seas and with Heaven she had Oceanos. Later, she bore Kronos. Gaia besides had Brontes, Stereopes, and Arges, who were Cyclopes. They each had merely one oculus in the center of their brows. They had to do and present boom and lightning bolts to Zeus. Kotos, Gyes, and Briareos were the three boies of Heaven and Earth. They were atrocious and violent. Each had one hundred weaponries and 50 caputs. They were really strong. Heaven hated them, so he threw them down into the Earth. Gaia did non like this, so she had Kronos cut off his male p arent # 8217 ; s genitalias and throw them into the sea. Aphrodite, the goddess of love and appeal, came from the cut off genitalias. Eros and Desire followed her wherever she went. Ouranos condemned his boies for their awful title and called them Titans. The Greeks seemed to hold had a God for everything. In this narrative, there was no reference of worlds, unlike the other narratives. However, like the Nipponese narrative, Heaven and Earth, were Gods in the Greek narrative, whereas in the Hebrew narrative, heaven and Earth were existent topographic points. Besides, like the Nipponese narrative, the Greek narrative told of Gods bring forthing other Gods. The Nipponese creative activity narrative began with Heaven and Earth dividing. They produced Divine Beings. Something was produced between Heaven and Earth that was transformed into a God, calle 500 Kuni-toko-tachi-no-Mikoto and seven divinities, including Izanagi-no-Mikoto and Izanami-no-Mikoto, who were male and female. The two divinities lived in Heaven and wondered if there was a state below them. They threw down a lance and found the Ocean and an island formed from the seawater that dripped from their lance. They went and lived on the island of Ono-goro-jima. They wanted to go hubby and married woman so that they could bring forth more states. So, they walked around the island individually and when they met the female radius foremost. The male did non O.K. of this so they walked around the land one time once more. This clip the male spoke first, and he said that he wished for the female to be his married woman. They began bring forthing islands, every bit good as, the sea, rivers, and mountains. Subsequently, they got together and produced person to be the Lord of the Universe. They produced the Sun-Goddess, Amaterasu-Mikami. The Sun-Goddess shone brilliantly so the two divinities sent her to Heaven. They besides produced the Moon God and besides sent it to Heaven. Next, they had Sosa-no-wo-no-Mikoto, who was average and sick tempered, so they sent him to the Nether-Land. This Nipponese creative activity narrative had many Gods unlike the Hebrew and Hindu narratives. This narrative was similar to the Hebrew narrative in that it had male and female in the beginning and they produced, but they produced different things. In the Hebrew narrative the worlds produced more worlds. In the Nipponese narrative the male and female are divinities that produced things on the Earth. In this narrative, Heaven and Earth produced a God, whereas in the Hebrew narrative, God created Heaven and Earth. This narrative was similar to the Grecian narrative because all of the Gods were produced from other Gods, and many had brothers and sisters. Last, the Hindu creative activity narrative told of Purusa. Purusa was a sacrificial God. He was the Lord of immortality and the lone Lord. He had one 1000 caputs, one 1000 eyes, and one 1000 pess. Three fourths of him was immortal up in Heaven and one 4th of him was all existences. His organic structure was divided into many different parts. From his spirit came the Moon. His eyes produced the Sun. Indra, the storm and war God, and Agni, the God of fire, came from his oral cavity. The air current came from his breath. His tummy was the sky, his caput was heaven, and his pess the Earth. Purusa was like the Hebrew God, because they were both considered the lone Lord. However, they were different because the Hebrew god looks like a adult male and Purusa does non. Purusa is a sacrificial God, unlike all of the other Gods in the other narratives. The lone reference of worlds in this narrative was explicating how the categories of people were arranged on Purusa # 8217 ; s organic structu re. Finally, all of the creative activity narratives were similar in ways, but different in other ways. The Hebrew narrative told of one God who was the swayer and shaper of everything. He made adult male and adult female to multiply and govern the Earth. The Grecian narrative had many Gods. Every God had his/her ain particular power over something. In the Nipponese creative activity narrative, Heaven and Earth made a God and many divinities. Last, the Hindu narrative told of Purusa, a sacrificial God, who # 8217 ; s parts were divided into all of the features of Eden and Earth.